The Aristotelian notion of noûs: Knowledge of first principles and contemplative life in Aristotle’s Protrepticus

  • Claudia Seggiaro Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the notion of noûs in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. For this, I will focus on fragments 24, 28, 65 (6) and 110 (10c). By examining fragment 24, I argue that noûs is a faculty whose goal is the knowledge of intelligible objects. Through the analysis of fragments 28 and 65 (6), I try to show that the exercise of this faculty is not only one activity among others, but that it is distinctive of human beings, their own function, and for this reason, that on which their happiness depends. Finally, by means of fragment 110 (10c), I try to demonstrate why, despite the fact the noûs accounts for the divine in man, it constitutes his specific nature, that which not only sets him apart from other beings, but also from gods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aubenque, Pierre (2008), El problema del ser en Aristóteles, Madrid, Escolar y Mayo Editores.

Aydede, Murat, (),Aristotle On Episteme And Nous: The Posterior Analytics, [http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/maydede/Aristotle.pdf], pp. 1-49. Aristotle (1998) “Aristotle On Episteme And Nous: The Posterior Analytics”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 36, núm. 1, pp. 15-46.

Berti, Enrico (2008a), Struttura e significato della Metafisica di Aristotele, Roma, Editora da Universidade do Sagrado Coração.

Berti, Enrico (2008b [c. 2006]), Las razones de Aristóteles, Buenos Aires, Oinos.

Berti, Enrico (2004), Nuovi studi aristotelici, Brescia, Morcelliana.

Bywater, Ingram (1869), “On a lost dialogue of Aristotle”, Journal of Philology, vol. II, pp. 55-69.

Calvo Martínez, Tomás (2000), “La noción de phýsis en los orígenes de la filosofía griega”, Δαίμων. Revista de Filosofía, núm. 21, pp. 21-38.

Caston, Victor (1999), “Aristotle’s two intellects. A modest proposal”, Phronesis, vol. 44, núm. 3, pp.

-227.

Chantraine, Pierre (1990), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots, París, Éditons Klincksieck.

Chen, Chung-Hwan (1965), “Different meanings of the term energeía in the philosophy of Aristotle”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Reseach, vol. 17, núm. 1, pp. 56-65.

Díaz, María Elena (2009), “Phantasía y noésis en el pensamiento aristotélico”, en María Elena Díaz y Graciela E. Marcos (eds.), El surgimiento de la phantasía en la Grecia Antigua, Buenos Aires, Prometeo, pp. 203-232.

Douglas Madison, Ryan (2008), First Philosophy: Aristotle’s Concept of Metaphysics, Chicago, Loyola University Chicago.

Fermani, Arianna (2008), Aristotele, le tre Etiche, estudio introductorio, traducción y notas, Milán, Bompiani.

Irwin, Terence (1988), Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford, The Clarendon Press.

Lee, Richard A. y Christopher P. Long (2007), “Noûs and lógos in Aristotle”, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, vol. 54, núm. 3, pp. 348-367.

Lefebvre, René (1997), “Faut-il traduire le vocable aristotélicien de ‘phantasia’ par ‘représentation’?”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain, vol. 95, núm. 4, pp. 587-616.

Lesher, James (1973), “The meaning of noûs in the Posterior Analytics”, Phronesis, vol. 18, núm. 1, pp. 44-68.

Liddell, Henry George y Robert Scott (1983), A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford, The Clarendon Press.

Matthews, Gareth B. (2003), “De anima 2. 2-4 and meaning of life”, en Amelie Oksenberg Rorty y Martha Nussbaum (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford, The Clarendon Press, pp. 185-193.

Megino Rodríguez, Carlos (2006), Protréptico, introducción, traducción y notas de Carlos Megino Rodríguez, Madrid, Abada.

Movia, Giancarlo (2007), Alessandro di Afrodisia, Commentario alla Metafisica di Aristotele, Milán, Bompiani.

Petrilli, Raffaella (2009), Linguaggio e filosofía nella Grecia antica, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.

Polansky, Ronald (2007), Aristotle’ De Anima. A Critical Commentary, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.

Quarantotto, Diana (2002), Causa finale, sostanza, essenza in Aristotele. Saggio sulla struttura dei processi teleologici naturali e sulla funzione del telos, Nápoles, Bibliopolis.

Van Der Meeren, Sophie (2011), Exhortation à la philosophie: Le dossier grec, Aristote, París, Les Belles Lettres.

Von Fritz, Kurt (1945), “Noûs, noeîn, and their derivatives in presocratic philosophy (excluding Anaxagoras)”, Classical Philology, vol. 40, núm. 4, pp. 223-242.

Published
07-12-2018
Section
Artículos