Coercion and the limits of justice. Considerations on Nagel and Blake

  • Francisco Blanco Brotons

Abstract

Nagel and Blake deny the existence of legitimate claims to equal distributive justice at the transnational or global level on the basis of the idea of coercion as the fundamental criterion for distinguishing the intra-state from the supra-state context. This article argues against this restriction. Firstly, the arguments presented by both authors are rebutted and, secondly, some general questions are raised that put in doubt that the criterion of coercion is adequate to interpret the perspective according to which the (basic) structure of society is, following Rawls, the primary object of (distributive) justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abizadeh, Arash (2007), "Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (not Site) of Distributive Justice", Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 35, núm. 4, pp. 318-358.

Armstrong, Chris (2009), "Coercion, Reciprocity, and Equality Beyond the State", Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 40, núm. 3, pp. 297-316.

Bayón Mohino, Juan Carlos (2007), "Ciudadanía, soberanía y democracia en el proceso de integración europea", Anuario de filosofía del Derecho, vol. 24, pp. 111-137.

Blake, Michael (2001), "Distributive Justcie, State Coercion, and Autonomy", Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 30, núm. 3, pp. 257-296.

Bohman, James (2010), Democracy Across Borders. From Dêmos to Dêmoi, Cambridge, Massachusetts y Londres, Inglaterra, The MIT Press.

Caney, Simon (2008), "Global Distributive Justice and the State", Political Studies, vol. 56, pp. 487-518.

Castoriadis, Cornelius (2013), La institución imaginaria de la sociedad, Ciudad de México, Tusquets.

Cohen, Joshua (1996), "Procedure and substance in Deliberative Democracy", en S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Cohen, Joshua, y Sabel, Charles (2006), "Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?", Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 34, núm. 2, pp. 147-175.

Forst, Rainer (2001), "Towards a critical theory of transnational justice", Metaphilosophy, vol. 32, núm. 1/2, pp. 160-179.

Forst, Rainer (2011), "Transnational justice and democracy", Normative orders, vol. 04/2011.

Forst, Rainer (2014), "Justice and democracy in transnational contexts: a critical realistic view", Social Research, vol. 81, núm. 3, pp. 667-682.

Freeman, Samuel (2006), "The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice", Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 23, núm. 1, pp. 29-68.

Habermas, Jürgen (2004), "De la política del poder a la sociedad civil mundial", en J. Habermas (Ed.), Tiempo de transiciones, Madrid, Trotta, pp. 29-41.

Höffe, Otfried (2003), Justicia política, Barcelona, Paidós.

Kant, Immanuel (2008), La metafísica de las costumbres, Madrid, Tecnos.

Mansbridge, Jane (1996), "The Democratic Moment and the Problem of Difference", en S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Nagel, Thomas (2008), "El problema de la justicia global", Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo, vol. 9, núm. 1, pp. 169-196.

Pettit, Philip (1999), Republicanismo : una teoría sobre la libertad y el gobierno, Barcelona, Paidós.

Pevnick, Ryan (2008), "Political Coercion and the Scope of Distributive Justice", Political Studies, vol. 56, pp. 399-413.

Rawls, John (2002), La justicia como equidad. Una reformulación, Barcelona, Paidós.

Rawls, John (2014), Teoría de la Justicia, Ciudad de México, Fondo de cultuta económica.

Raz, Joseph (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Rodrigo, Ángel J. (2016), "Entre Westfalia y Worldfalia: la comunidad internacional como comunidad social, política y jurídica", en C. García Segura (Ed.), La tensión cosmopolita. Avances y límites en la institucionalización del cosmopolitismo, Madrid, Tecnos, pp. 23-63.

Sangiovanni, Andrea (2007), "Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State", Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 35, núm. 1, pp. 3-39.

Sangiovanni, Andrea (2008), "Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality", The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 16, núm. 2, pp. 137-164.

Sangiovanni, Andrea (2012), "The Irrelevance of Coercion, Imposition, and Framing to Distributive Justice", Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 40, núm. 2, pp. 79-110.

Sassen, Saskia (2001), ¿Perdiendo el control? La soberanía en la era de la globalización, Barcelona, Bellaterra.

Shapiro, Ian (1999), Democratic Justice, New Haven, Yale university press.

Tan, Kok-Chor (2006), "The Boundary of Justice and the Justice of Boundaries: Defending Global Egalitarianism", Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. XIX, núm. 2, pp. 319-344.

Valentini, Laura (2011), "Coercion and (Global) Justice", The American Political Science Review, vol. 105, núm. 1, pp. 205-220.

Velasco, Juan Carlos (2010), "La justicia en un mundo globalizado", Isegoría, vol. 43, pp. 349-362.

Young, Iris Marion (2000a), Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Young, Iris Marion (2000b), La justicia y la política de la diferencia, Madrid, Cátedra.

Zürn, Michael (2004), "Global Gobernance and Legitimacy Problems", Goverment and Opposition, vol. 39, núm. 2, pp. 260-287.

Published
30-01-2020
Section
Artículos