Can a Kantian be partial to his loved ones? A discussion against recurring objections

Abstract

In this article I show that duly justified partiality towards our loved ones is part of the Kantian moral project. Unlike the critics who advocate a reading in which the impartiality of the judgment in this ethics forces not to take into account personal relationships when making moral decisions, I defend the hypothesis that a Kantian can be partial with his loved ones, this for systematic and textual reasons.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniela Alegría Fuentes, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile y Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Daniela Alegría Fuentes es Doctora en Filosofía (2020) por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid y Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, magíster en Filosofía (2015) por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile y Licenciada en Filosofía (2011) por la Universidad de Chile. Entre sus publicaciones destacan: “La ética del amor de Iris Murdoch” (Eidos, 2019), “Imparcialidad y particularismo moral” (Tópicos, 2019), Kant y los retos práctico-morales de la actualidad (Madrid, Tecnos, 2017). Sus áreas de investigación son la filosofía moral y la filosofía moderna. 

References

Allison, Henry (1990), Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Anscombe, Elizabeth (1958), “Modern moral philosophy”, Philosophy, vol. 33, núm. 124, pp. 1-19.

Baier, Kurt (1958), The Moral Point of View: A Rational Basis for Ethics, Ithaca-Nueva York, Cornell University Press.

Baron, Marcia (1995), Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology, Ithaca-Londres, Cornell University Press.

Baron, Marcia (1991), “Impartiality and friendship”, Ethics, vol. 101, núm. 4, pp. 836-857.

Baron, Marcia (1986), “On admirable immorality”, Ethics, vol. 96, núm. 3, pp. 557-566.

Betzler, Monika (ed.). (2008), Kant's Ethics of Virtue, de Gruyter. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110209655]

Darwall, Stephen (1997), Philosophical Ethics, Boulder, Westview Press.

Darwall, Stephen (1983), Impartial Reason, Ithaca-Nueva York, Cornell University Press.

De Haro, Vicente (2015), Duty, Virtue and Practical Reason in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals, Hildesheim, Georg Olms Verlag.

Denis, Lara (2010), Kant’s ‘Metaphysics of Morals’: A Critical Guide, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Denis, Lara (2001), “From friendship to marriage: Revising Kant”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 63, núm. 1, pp. 1-28.

Fasching, Maria (1990), Zum Begriff der Freundschaft bei Aristoteles und Kant, Wurzburg, Konigshausen & Neumann, Band LXX.

Foot, Philippa (1978), Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Gilligan, Carol (1982), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Cambridge-Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

Guisán, Esperanza (coord.) (1988), Esplendor y miseria de la ética kantiana, Barcelona, Anthropos.

Held, Virginia (2006), The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global, Nueva York Oxford University Press.

Herman, Barbara (2007), Moral Literacy, Nueva York, Harvard University Press.

Herman, Barbara (1993), The Practice of Moral Judgment, Massachussets, Harvard University Press.

Herman, Barbara (1983), “Integrity and impartiality”, The Monist, vol. 66, núm. 2, pp. 233-250.

Hurthouse, Rosalind (1999), On Virtue Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Jollimore, T. (2018), “Impartiality”, en Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/impartiality/], consultado:

Kant, Immanuel (1990 y ss.), Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften, Berlín, Königlich Preuβischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Korsgaard, Christine (2000), Las fuentes de la normatividad, México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

MacIntyre, Alasdair (2015), Tras la virtud, Barcelona, Austral.

Manning, Rita (1992), Speaking from the Heart: A Feminist Perspective on Ethics, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Mulgan, Tim (2001), The Demands of Consequentialism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Musschenga, Albert W. (2005), “The debate on impartiality: An introduction”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 8, núms. 1-2, pp. 1-10.

Noddings, Nel (2009), La educación moral, Buenos Aires/Madrid, Amorrortu.

O’Neill, Onora (1993), “Kantian ethics”, en Peter Singer (ed). Companion to Ethics, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 175-185.

Paton, Herbert James (1956), The Moral Law: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, Londres, Hutchinson University Library.

Rivera de Rosales, Jacinto (2007), “Prólogo” en Daniela Alegría y Paula Órdenes (coord.), Kant y los retos práctico-morales de la actualidad, Madrid, Tecnos, pp. 13-23.

Roldán, Concha (2013), “Ni virtuosas ni ciudadanas: inconsistencias prácticas en la teoría de Kant”, Ideas y Valores, vol. 62, núm. 1, pp. 185-203.

Scheffler, Samuel (2001), Boundaries and Allegiances, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.

Schiller, Friedrich (1962), De la dignidad y la gracia, Buenos Aires, Editorial Nova.

Schönecker, Dieter (2013), “Duties to others from love”, en Andreas Trampota, Oliver Sensen y Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant’s “Tugendlehre”. A Comprehensive Commentary, Berlín/Boston, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 309-342.

Sticker, Martin (2019), “Kant, moral overdemandingness and self-scrutiny”, Noûs, vol. 2019, pp. 1-24.

Stocker, Michael (1976), “The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 73, núm. 14, pp. 453-466.

Tronto, Joan (1993), Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, Nueva York, Routledge.

Velleman, J. David (1999), “Love as moral emotion”, Ethics, vol. 109, núm. 2, pp. 338-374.

Williams, Bernard y John Jamieson C. Smart. (1973), Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Williams, Bernard (1981), Moral Luck, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Wood, Allen (1999), Kant’s Ethical Thought, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.

Published
14-04-2021
Section
Artículos